Header logo is

Beyond Basins of Attraction: Evaluating Robustness of Natural Dynamics




It is commonly accepted that properly designing a system to exhibit favorable natural dynamics can greatly simplify designing or learning the control policy. It is however still unclear what constitutes favorable natural dynamics, and how to quantify its effect. Most studies of simple walking and running models have focused on the basins of attraction of passive limit-cycles, and the notion of self-stability. We emphasize instead the importance of stepping beyond basins of attraction. We show an approach based on viability theory to quantify robustness, valid for the family of all robust control policies. This allows us to evaluate the robustness inherent to the natural dynamics before designing the control policy or specifying a control objective. We illustrate this approach on simple spring mass models of running and show previously unexplored advantages to using a nonlinear leg stiffness. We believe designing robots with robust natural dynamics is particularly important for enabling learning control policies directly in hardware.

Author(s): Steve Heim, and Alexander Sproewitz
Journal: arXiv preprint arXiv:1806.08081
Year: 2018

Department(s): Dynamic Locomotion
Research Project(s): Viability, Learning and Robust Natural Dynamics
Bibtex Type: Unpublished (unpublished)
Paper Type: Journal

URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/1806.08081

Links: arXiv preprint arXiv:1806.08081


  title = {Beyond Basins of Attraction: Evaluating Robustness of Natural Dynamics},
  author = {Heim, Steve and Sproewitz, Alexander},
  journal = {arXiv preprint arXiv:1806.08081},
  year = {2018},
  url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/1806.08081}