Header logo is


2018


no image
Direct Sparse Odometry With Rolling Shutter

Schubert, D., Usenko, V., Demmel, N., Stueckler, J., Cremers, D.

European Conference on Computer Vision (ECCV), September 2018, accepted as oral presentation (conference)

ev

[BibTex]

2018


[BibTex]


no image
Deep Virtual Stereo Odometry: Leveraging Deep Depth Prediction for Monocular Direct Sparse Odometry

Yang, N., Wang, R., Stueckler, J., Cremers, D.

European Conference on Computer Vision (ECCV), September 2018, accepted as oral presentation, arXiv 1807.02570 (conference)

ev

link (url) [BibTex]

link (url) [BibTex]


no image
Discovering and Teaching Optimal Planning Strategies

Lieder, F., Callaway, F., Krueger, P. M., Das, P., Griffiths, T. L., Gul, S.

In The 14th biannual conference of the German Society for Cognitive Science, GK, September 2018, Falk Lieder and Frederick Callaway contributed equally to this publication. (inproceedings)

Abstract
How should we think and decide, and how can we learn to make better decisions? To address these questions we formalize the discovery of cognitive strategies as a metacognitive reinforcement learning problem. This formulation leads to a computational method for deriving optimal cognitive strategies and a feedback mechanism for accelerating the process by which people learn how to make better decisions. As a proof of concept, we apply our approach to develop an intelligent system that teaches people optimal planning stratgies. Our training program combines a novel process-tracing paradigm that makes peoples latent planning strategies observable with an intelligent system that gives people feedback on how their planning strategy could be improved. The pedagogy of our intelligent tutor is based on the theory that people discover their cognitive strategies through metacognitive reinforcement learning. Concretely, the tutor’s feedback is designed to maximally accelerate people’s metacognitive reinforcement learning towards the optimal cognitive strategy. A series of four experiments confirmed that training with the cognitive tutor significantly improved people’s decision-making competency: Experiment 1 demonstrated that the cognitive tutor’s feedback accelerates participants’ metacognitive learning. Experiment 2 found that this training effect transfers to more difficult planning problems in more complex environments. Experiment 3 found that these transfer effects are retained for at least 24 hours after the training. Finally, Experiment 4 found that practicing with the cognitive tutor conveys additional benefits above and beyond verbal description of the optimal planning strategy. The results suggest that promoting metacognitive reinforcement learning with optimal feedback is a promising approach to improving the human mind.

re

link (url) Project Page [BibTex]

link (url) Project Page [BibTex]


no image
Discovering Rational Heuristics for Risky Choice

Gul, S., Krueger, P. M., Callaway, F., Griffiths, T. L., Lieder, F.

The 14th biannual conference of the German Society for Cognitive Science, GK, The 14th biannual conference of the German Society for Cognitive Science, GK, September 2018 (conference)

Abstract
How should we think and decide to make the best possible use of our precious time and limited cognitive resources? And how do people’s cognitive strategies compare to this ideal? We study these questions in the domain of multi-alternative risky choice using the methodology of resource-rational analysis. To answer the first question, we leverage a new meta-level reinforcement learning algorithm to derive optimal heuristics for four different risky choice environments. We find that our method rediscovers two fast-and-frugal heuristics that people are known to use, namely Take-The-Best and choosing randomly, as resource-rational strategies for specific environments. Our method also discovered a novel heuristic that combines elements of Take-The-Best and Satisficing. To answer the second question, we use the Mouselab paradigm to measure how people’s decision strategies compare to the predictions of our resource-rational analysis. We found that our resource-rational analysis correctly predicted which strategies people use and under which conditions they use them. While people generally tend to make rational use of their limited resources overall, their strategy choices do not always fully exploit the structure of each decision problem. Overall, people’s decision operations were about 88% as resource-rational as they could possibly be. A formal model comparison confirmed that our resource-rational model explained people’s decision strategies significantly better than the Directed Cognition model of Gabaix et al. (2006). Our study is a proof-of-concept that optimal cognitive strategies can be automatically derived from the principle of resource-rationality. Our results suggest that resource-rational analysis is a promising approach for uncovering people’s cognitive strategies and revisiting the debate about human rationality with a more realistic normative standard.

re

link (url) Project Page [BibTex]

link (url) Project Page [BibTex]


no image
Learning to Select Computations

Callaway, F., Gul, S., Krueger, P. M., Griffiths, T. L., Lieder, F.

In Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence: Proceedings of the Thirty-Fourth Conference, August 2018, Frederick Callaway and Sayan Gul and Falk Lieder contributed equally to this publication. (inproceedings)

Abstract
The efficient use of limited computational resources is an essential ingredient of intelligence. Selecting computations optimally according to rational metareasoning would achieve this, but this is computationally intractable. Inspired by psychology and neuroscience, we propose the first concrete and domain-general learning algorithm for approximating the optimal selection of computations: Bayesian metalevel policy search (BMPS). We derive this general, sample-efficient search algorithm for a computation-selecting metalevel policy based on the insight that the value of information lies between the myopic value of information and the value of perfect information. We evaluate BMPS on three increasingly difficult metareasoning problems: when to terminate computation, how to allocate computation between competing options, and planning. Across all three domains, BMPS achieved near-optimal performance and compared favorably to previously proposed metareasoning heuristics. Finally, we demonstrate the practical utility of BMPS in an emergency management scenario, even accounting for the overhead of metareasoning.

re

link (url) Project Page [BibTex]

link (url) Project Page [BibTex]


A resource-rational analysis of human planning
A resource-rational analysis of human planning

Callaway, F., Lieder, F., Das, P., Gul, S., Krueger, P. M., Griffiths, T. L.

In Proceedings of the 40th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, May 2018, Frederick Callaway and Falk Lieder contributed equally to this publication. (inproceedings)

Abstract
People's cognitive strategies are jointly shaped by function and computational constraints. Resource-rational analysis leverages these constraints to derive rational models of people's cognitive strategies from the assumption that people make rational use of limited cognitive resources. We present a resource-rational analysis of planning and evaluate its predictions in a newly developed process tracing paradigm. In Experiment 1, we find that a resource-rational planning strategy predicts the process by which people plan more accurately than previous models of planning. Furthermore, in Experiment 2, we find that it also captures how people's planning strategies adapt to the structure of the environment. In addition, our approach allows us to quantify for the first time how close people's planning strategies are to being resource-rational and to characterize in which ways they conform to and deviate from optimal planning.

re

DOI [BibTex]

DOI [BibTex]


no image
The TUM VI Benchmark for Evaluating Visual-Inertial Odometry

Schubert, D., Goll, T., Demmel, N., Usenko, V., Stueckler, J., Cremers, D.

In IEEE International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), 2018, arXiv:1804.06120 (inproceedings)

ev

[BibTex]

[BibTex]


no image
Variational Network Quantization

Achterhold, J., Koehler, J. M., Schmeink, A., Genewein, T.

In International Conference on Learning Representations , 2018 (inproceedings)

ev

link (url) [BibTex]

link (url) [BibTex]


no image
Light field intrinsics with a deep encoder-decoder network

Alperovich, A., Johannsen, O., Strecke, M., Goldluecke, B.

In IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), 2018 (inproceedings)

ev

link (url) [BibTex]

link (url) [BibTex]


no image
Sublabel-accurate convex relaxation with total generalized variation regularization

(DAGM Best Master's Thesis Award)

Strecke, M., Goldluecke, B.

In German Conference on Pattern Recognition (Proc. GCPR), 2018 (inproceedings)

ev

link (url) [BibTex]

link (url) [BibTex]

2015


no image
Real-Time Object Detection, Localization and Verification for Fast Robotic Depalletizing

Holz, D., Topalidou-Kyniazopoulou, A., Stueckler, J., Behnke, S.

In IEEE International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), 2015 (inproceedings)

ev

link (url) [BibTex]

2015


link (url) [BibTex]


no image
Dense Continuous-Time Tracking and Mapping with Rolling Shutter RGB-D Cameras

Kerl, C., Stueckler, J., Cremers, D.

In IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV), Santiago, Chile, 2015, {[video][supplementary][datasets]} (inproceedings)

ev

[BibTex]

[BibTex]


no image
When to use which heuristic: A rational solution to the strategy selection problem

Lieder, F., Griffiths, T. L.

In Proceedings of the 37th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, 2015 (inproceedings)

Abstract
The human mind appears to be equipped with a toolbox full of cognitive strategies, but how do people decide when to use which strategy? We leverage rational metareasoning to derive a rational solution to this problem and apply it to decision making under uncertainty. The resulting theory reconciles the two poles of the debate about human rationality by proposing that people gradually learn to make rational use of fallible heuristics. We evaluate this theory against empirical data and existing accounts of strategy selection (i.e. SSL and RELACS). Our results suggest that while SSL and RELACS can explain people's ability to adapt to homogeneous environments in which all decision problems are of the same type, rational metareasoning can additionally explain people's ability to adapt to heterogeneous environments and flexibly switch strategies from one decision to the next.

re

link (url) Project Page [BibTex]

link (url) Project Page [BibTex]


no image
Large-Scale Direct SLAM with Stereo Cameras

Engel, J., Stueckler, J., Cremers, D.

In IEEE International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), 2015 (inproceedings)

ev

[BibTex]

[BibTex]


no image
Children and Adults Differ in their Strategies for Social Learning

Lieder, F., Sim, Z. L., Hu, J. C., Griffiths, T. L., Xu, F.

In Proceedings of the 37th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, 2015 (inproceedings)

Abstract
Adults and children rely heavily on other people’s testimony. However, domains of knowledge where there is no consensus on the truth are likely to result in conflicting testimonies. Previous research has demonstrated that in these cases, learners look towards the majority opinion to make decisions. However, it remains unclear how learners evaluate social information, given that considering either the overall valence, or the number of testimonies, or both may lead to different conclusions. We therefore formalized several social learning strategies and compared them to the performance of adults and children. We find that children use different strategies than adults. This suggests that the development of social learning may involve the acquisition of cognitive strategies.

re

link (url) [BibTex]

link (url) [BibTex]


no image
Motion Cooperation: Smooth Piece-Wise Rigid Scene Flow from RGB-D Images

Jaimez, M., Souiai, M., Stueckler, J., Gonzalez-Jimenez, J., Cremers, D.

In Proc. of the Int. Conference on 3D Vision (3DV), October 2015, {[video]} (inproceedings)

ev

[BibTex]

[BibTex]


no image
Learning from others: Adult and child strategies in assessing conflicting ratings

Hu, J., Lieder, F., Griffiths, T. L., Xu, F.

In Biennial Meeting of the Society for Research in Child Development, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA, 2015 (inproceedings)

re

[BibTex]

[BibTex]


no image
Super-Resolution Keyframe Fusion for 3D Modeling with High-Quality Textures

Maier, R., Stueckler, J., Cremers, D.

In International Conference on 3D Vision (3DV), October 2015, {[slides] [poster]} (inproceedings)

ev

[BibTex]

[BibTex]


no image
Utility-weighted sampling in decisions from experience

Lieder, F., Griffiths, T. L., Hsu, M.

In The 2nd Multidisciplinary Conference on Reinforcement Learning and Decision Making, 2015 (inproceedings)

re

[BibTex]

[BibTex]


no image
Reconstructing Street-Scenes in Real-Time From a Driving Car

Usenko, V., Engel, J., Stueckler, J., Cremers, D.

In Proc. of the Int. Conference on 3D Vision (3DV), October 2015 (inproceedings)

ev

[BibTex]

[BibTex]

2009


no image
Integrating indoor mobility, object manipulation, and intuitive interaction for domestic service tasks

Stueckler, J., Behnke, S.

In Proc. of the IEEE-RAS Int. Conf. on Humanoid Robots (Humanoids), pages: 506-513, December 2009 (inproceedings)

ev

link (url) DOI [BibTex]

2009


link (url) DOI [BibTex]


no image
Dynamaid, an Anthropomorphic Robot for Research on Domestic Service Applications

Stueckler, J., Schreiber, M., Behnke, S.

In Proc. of the European Conference on Mobile Robots (ECMR), pages: 87-92, 2009 (inproceedings)

ev

link (url) [BibTex]

link (url) [BibTex]